The foundation of a biomimetic materials economy is the trifecta of biodegradability, low toxicity, and biogenic or sequestered carbon. These safe and circular materials rely on structure to create performance functions like water repellency or color. Learn more about how nature designs at AskNature.org.
Ultimately, a healthy materials metabolism means that waste is converted into building blocks for future material production, toxic chemicals are not used as inputs or outputs, and potential energy is unlocked.
Significant GHG savings are expected from increasing our reliance on biogenic (i.e., living) sources of carbon. An evolved materials economy will still need platform chemicals, even with more intelligent design based on biological structures. Those chemicals can now come from biomass feedstocks that are abundant, renewable, sequester carbon and can be economically cycled back into the bioeconomy. Historically, industry has relied on petrochemicals. The refineries of the future will be biorefineries making chemicals from biomass.
Note: we have to be careful with biomass—this isn’t about exploiting sources like forests or mono-cropping—but it can include any organic waste (think poop). You can break it down into something usable either with heat or bacteria/enzymes, which is precisely what our pilots are demonstrating. The question is, can we “spike” biomass sources with less savory textile waste (like that raincoat), and still get a biocompatible result? That’s what we are testing now.
In Northern Europe, the pilot tackles waste from a major regional collector/sorter: using a biological pathway to produce glucose and a thermochemical pathway to process the plastic fraction that would otherwise be destined for burning or burying.
In Accra, Ghana, the pilot focuses on remediating the harm done to Korle Lagoon: seeing if applied biomimicry can break down years of accumulated textiles (and other things) that ended up in the wrong place.
To successfully grow a biomimetic materials economy, materials need to be familiar to nature and capable of cycling, ideally, through biological processes. The D4T initiative supported research to examine biodegradability within the context of chemicals, materials and ecosystems.
Our ability to test for biodegradability is tempered by the complexity of natural systems that ultimately determine the environmental fate of materials that are released into the environment. Standardized testing methods for biodegradation are not a realistic proxy for measuring the fate of materials in dynamic natural systems. We need more sophisticated testing methods and computational tools to better predict the biodegradability of chemicals and materials. To that end, D4T collaborated with the Yale Center for Green Chemistry and Green Engineering to build a model that incorporates experimental and estimated data along with the molecular properties of chemicals to better predict their potential biodegradability. Estimating the biodegradability of complex materials which can be combinations of multiple chemicals or substrates is even more difficult. D4T collaborated with Leeds University in the U.K. to conduct a literature review of existing research examining the biodegradability of textile fabrics including their colorants and finishing chemistries, and their toxicity as they decompose. The D4T team created a summary of this research and its key findings to share with industry ahead of a peer-reviewed publication in a series of three info-sheets:
The Laudes Foundation has provided catalytic funding for this ambitious project.