The objective of the Rotterdam, Netherlands pilot is to divert unwanted textiles from being incinerated, buried in a landfill, or being shipped and polluting the Global South. Recycling mixed waste into commercially valuable outputs is one of the biggest technological challenges facing industry. So our process began by partnering with the Metabolic Institute and documenting over 200 decomposition technologies that could theoretically break down this mixed waste fraction. As our goal was to test a pathway that could be implemented today, we had to put aside many promising technologies which are still in the lab stage. But we see this field evolving quickly as both climate and end-of-life Extended Producer Responsibility legislation becomes a reality in Northern Europe, which will make incineration less feasible.
Circle Economy selected implementing technology partners (see below) for a proof-of concept test before running a full pilot at more substantial volumes. This was a low-risk, affordable way to test the solutions against our complicated mixed waste stream. The next phase of work will be the full pilot, hopefully to begin later this fall, and will likely include some changes to the approach. Here is a synopsis of our early findings, with more detail in this report:
Alongside these applications, the pilot also was able to use the synthetic fractions by drying the residual slurry. In partnership with TNO, the Dutch applied scientific research institute, the dried fraction was gasified and generated gasses such as hydrogen (H), carbon monoxide (CO), carbon dioxide (CO2), and methane (CH4), which can be used as building blocks for other biological processes to create new and safe materials and products. One such subsequent process was outlined by our German partners, Beneficial Design Institute and Regenerate Fashion, who proposed running CO2 through microalgae to yield beta glucans: soluble fibers that come from the cell walls of bacteria, fungi, yeasts, and plants. Beta glucans have both agricultural (fertilizer) and health (food additive, pharmaceutical) uses. Other ingredients derived from microalgae are oils, fertilizers, animal feed, medicines, cosmetics and biofuels.
1. Cascading or sequential biorecycling
Recycling mixed waste into commercially valuable outputs is one of the biggest technological challenges facing industry. Biorecycling may offer several opportunities for processing mixed textile waste. One opportunity may be to use enzymatic hydrolysis to sort mixed textiles into their respective fibers through a sequential or cascading process where target fibers are culled out selectively by enzymes to isolate them first and then hydrolyze them into various feedstocks or intermediate chemicals like glucose from cellulosics or monomers from synthetics. This is an intermediate step while industry learns to make 100% bio-based fibers designed for rapid biodegradation and recovery of monomers or conversion into platform chemicals.
2. Growing the bioeconomy and biomimetic supply chains
As the U.S. and other countries take on the inevitable challenges of growing their bioeconomies, they will need to look for all opportunities to utilize “legacy” materials as feedstocks to help build the infrastructure for converting biogenic sources of carbon into biomimetic material supply chains. One such opportunity might be to utilize the biorefinery concept to blend mixed textiles with biomass to create multiple types of products (chemicals, fuels and power). Different combinations of synthetic and organic feedstocks will determine both the amounts and types of outputs produced.
Both the bioreactors and ecosystem modules are currently operational as interconnected systems in pilot state at The Or Foundation’s facility directly behind Kantamanto Market in Accra, from which The Or Foundation’s Accra-based team and international consulting scientists have been able to collect and begin analysis of initial findings to continue design iterations.
Natural resource cycles have three common characteristics: release (such as the transpiration of water vapor by plants); uptake (such as animals transforming ingested nitrogen in the form of plant proteins into muscle and blood cells); and storage (such as carbon storage in vegetation). Human industrial material resource flows do the same, but with critical differences, namely, our systems are not set up to allow for cycling resources effectively. Take fashion for example, which extracts resources from fossil and natural sources, turns those inputs into materials and clothing, but rarely cycles its resources back into the system from which it is extracted.
When speaking about sustainability, we often default to biodegradability or recyclability as a criteria for circularity, overlooking toxicity. Yet the longer hazardous materials and chemicals persist in the environment, the more likely they are to cause adverse effects. How we measure and design products to effectively manage both of these attributes is the basis for the research of D4T’s third project around green chemistry and biomimetic design.
This research examines biodegradability and toxicity at the chemical and material level. Collaborators were Yale’s Center for Green Chemistry and Green Engineering and Leeds University’s School of Design, along with beach and microfiber characterization by both the Or Foundation and University of Ghana, and a set of recommendations from textile industry advisors to the Biomimicry Institute.
Our research began by looking at how material transformation works in nature. Decomposition is about more than how materials break down: it is about the processes that transform molecules into valuable nutrients, feedstocks, resources, and other substances that sustain life. The Biomimicry Institute’s team did a deep-dive into how biological structures and processes facilitate release, uptake, and storage of nutrients, with a goal of providing direction to industry when making next-generation materials.
As chemicals are not the same as materials given their interaction, we also partnered with Professor Richard Blackburn of Leeds University to do a literature review of textile material degradation. Biodegradability is often discussed as an either/or condition (it is not), and the appropriate end-of-life solution for natural materials (in some cases). A stronger understanding of biodegradability, and the current state of textiles enables all parties in this industry to advocate for changes in current textile production and reutilization that benefit human health and the environment. Key take-aways from this literature review (and synopsis) conducted by PhD candidate Olivia Skilbeck and Libby Sommer, to be published later in 2024, are:
The Laudes Foundation has provided catalytic funding for this ambitious project.